THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 447:L53-L57, 1995 July 1
© 1995. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.


Next: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Previous: §3. SHORT-LIVED EXTINCT RADIOACTIVITIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Top: TITLE PAGE


§4. DISCUSSION

     Cosmic rays are usually considered to be accelerated by magnetic fields in hydrodynamically active regions, in which kinetic energy of mass motions can be transferred magnetically into particle energies. Thus it is understandable that the Orion phenomena of gamma rays and an excess carbon and oxygen low-energy cosmic-ray flux should be interpreted as a common property of star formation regions. However, our analysis suggests an attractive alternative that may provide a more consistent picture. These phenomena may be direct consequences of the supernova explosions themselves, and thus must be limited in time, but may also be episodic when new explosions occur.

     The lifetime of interstellar molecular clouds, not counting formation times, is 1-3 × 10 yr according to the ages of the oldest T Tauri stars projected on clouds with visual extinction greater than 1 mag (e.g., Walter et al. 1988), or according to ages of OB associations with associated molecular gas (Blaauw 1991), and so the massive stars formed within such a cloud only reach the supernova stage for masses possibly as low as 9 M during the lifetime of the cloud. Only a subset of these explosions can eject very energetic carbon and oxygen ions as Type Ib supernovae, so the distinctive pattern of the deexcitation gamma rays from these ions must also be quite rare, and the lifetime of the gamma-ray emission is likely to be only a few thousand years. The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory was apparently fortunately launched at a time when the nearest major star-forming region was host to such an event.

     Our analysis of the injection of short-lived radioactivities into molecular cloud cores situated close (a few parsecs) to supernova explosions indicates that such injection should occur in a significant fraction of the cores in a molecular cloud and the actual level of the radioactivities found in a resulting planetary system should be quite variable. Already for I in the solar system, with a mean life of 2.3 × 10 yr, the source appears to have been distant r-process-producing supernovae (Cameron 1993; Cameron, Thielemann, & Cowan 1993) near 10 M, and thus on its timescale a significant general background abundance level of such radioactivities appears to exist in molecular clouds and will become part of the cores that are formed.

     The supernova ejecta may become well mixed within the core that it has impacted, but nevertheless, this can leave the grains in the core with a new set of isotopic anomalies. The condensible atoms within the core prior to the arrival of the shock wave are already condensed. After compression and admixture of the swept-up interstellar medium and diluted supernova ejecta, that admixed material will also chemically attach, but in this case to the surfaces of the preexisting grains. In the face of a size spectrum for that dust, the smallest dust will generally become most enriched (per unit mass) in the diluted supernova ejecta. These differing isotopic patterns fingerprint the subsequent chemical rearrangements as a form of chemical memory (Clayton 1982).

     We have concluded that the core giving rise to the solar system was situated approximately in the range 2-10 pc from the site of a massive supernova explosion in the parent molecular cloud. A typical core in a cloud containing OB associations would lie somewhat farther away from the site of the association, but within the cloud lifetime the O stars can travel significant distances into the cloud before exploding; so the event we have described may be somewhat unusual, but it should not be rare. Even at larger distances the more gentle injection of Al into a core should be common. However, a majority of cores that form stars are not subjected to quite such violent hydrodynamics resulting from this deformation and injection as appears to have been the case for the Sun, and it is important that the special character of this type of event should receive further study.


Next: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Previous: §3. SHORT-LIVED EXTINCT RADIOACTIVITIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Top: TITLE PAGE